Managed print service cost savings are often faster to realise than businesses expect, and many of the most effective changes cost nothing to implement. Here is where to focus.
Start With the Fleet Itself
Rationalise Desktop Printers First
The single highest-impact action most businesses can take is fleet rationalisation: identifying and removing the sprawl of small, unmanaged desktop printers that accumulate across departments over time.
Each desktop inkjet or personal laser printer carries its own cost-per-page — often significantly higher than a centralised Multi-Function Printer (MFP) — along with its own maintenance demands, consumable requirements, and administrative overhead. Replacing four or five desktop units with one well-positioned floor-standing MFP typically reduces total cost per click, cuts the number of separate consumable lines to manage, and removes devices that often sit outside the managed print contract entirely.
This “shadow IT” problem is more common than most businesses realise. When a department buys a small printer on an expense account to avoid sharing a communal device, they are bypassing every cost-control mechanism the MPS contract was designed to provide.
Audit Before You Assume
A proper fleet audit — mapping which devices are used, how often, and at what cost per page — regularly surfaces machines running at a fraction of their duty cycle while generating disproportionate costs. Q4 is a natural moment to commission this review, because the data feeds directly into the following year’s budget planning.
Change the Default Settings
This is the closest thing to a free saving in managed print. Default settings govern how every print job behaves unless someone actively overrides them, which means a single policy change cascades across the entire workforce instantly.
The most impactful defaults to review:
- Duplex (double-sided) by default — halves paper consumption on most document types without any change in user behaviour
- Mono by default for internal documents — colour print rates are typically three to five times higher than mono; internal memos, draft reports, and meeting agendas rarely need colour
- Draft quality for internal printing — reduces toner consumption on documents that will be read once and discarded
- Print job timeout — automatically deletes uncollected jobs after a set period, preventing toner and paper being consumed for documents no one retrieves
Colour overuse on internal communications is one of the most consistent sources of avoidable print spend. Defaulting to mono for everything except client-facing output can reduce the cost of individual documents by a significant margin.
Implement Pull Printing
User authentication printing — sometimes called pull printing or follow-me printing — holds a job in a secure queue until the user swipes a badge or enters a PIN at the device. Nothing prints until someone is physically standing there to collect it.
The case for this is straightforward. Studies in managed print environments suggest uncollected documents can represent up to 20% of total print volume. Those pages consume toner, paper, and machine wear, and then go directly into a recycling bin or, worse, a general waste bin containing sensitive information.
Pull printing eliminates that waste entirely. It also removes the security risk of confidential documents sitting in an output tray in a shared space — a genuine compliance concern for businesses handling personal data under UK GDPR.
Address the Budget Flush Directly
The end-of-year “use it or lose it” impulse leads many offices and schools to stockpile toner — buying supplies manually to exhaust the budget before it disappears. In a properly structured MPS contract, this spend is not just unnecessary; it is actively counterproductive.
MPS agreements typically include automated consumable replenishment triggered by device telemetry. The machine signals when toner is running low; the supplier dispatches a replacement before it runs out. Manual stockpiling creates duplicate inventory, risks using incompatible consumables, and adds administrative overhead for no operational benefit.
If this pattern exists in your organisation, Q4 is exactly the right moment to address it — both to avoid the redundant spend and to make the case internally for what the managed contract already covers.
Upgrade Legacy Hardware if the Numbers Stack Up
Older devices in a fleet can quietly undermine managed print cost savings in two ways. First, they often lack the firmware capability to support pull printing, usage tracking, or granular policy enforcement without expensive third-party hardware additions. Second, their energy consumption in idle and sleep states may be significantly higher than modern Energy Star-certified equivalents, adding to utility costs that rarely appear on a print budget line but are real overhead nonetheless.
Whether upgrading legacy hardware makes financial sense in Q4 depends on the remaining lease term, the cost of the new agreement, and the projected savings. It is worth modelling the TCO comparison properly rather than assuming newer is always better — but equally, retaining old hardware purely to avoid a conversation about contract terms is a false economy.
What Not to Do as the Year Ends
A few common Q4 actions that feel productive but tend to backfire:
- Cutting minimum volume commitments mid-contract — if you are already below your billing threshold, reducing print volume further will not reduce invoices until the contract is renegotiated
- Removing shared devices without a clear alternative — employee resistance to centralisation is real and manageable, but only with a clear policy and communication plan; removing convenience without explanation creates friction and workarounds
- Assuming hybrid working has automatically reduced print costs — post-2020 office print volumes are genuinely variable, and some businesses have seen consolidation of printing into fewer, higher-intensity sessions rather than an overall reduction
In Summary
- Fleet rationalisation — removing unmanaged desktop printers — is the single highest-impact structural change available
- Default settings changes (duplex, mono, draft quality) deliver immediate savings at zero cost
- Pull printing eliminates uncollected document waste, which can account for up to 20% of total print volume
- Q4 toner stockpiling is redundant in a properly structured MPS contract and should be addressed directly
- Legacy hardware may be quietly undermining both cost efficiency and policy enforcement capability
- Minimum billing thresholds mean that reducing print volume only saves money once contract terms reflect the new reality
The businesses that extract the most value from managed print are not necessarily the ones on the best contract rates. They are the ones who actively manage behaviour, defaults, and fleet composition — and Q4 is as good a moment as any to start.
Related posts:
What Your Admin Assistant’s Thinking (But Would Never Tell You to Your Face)
The Document Dilemma: Are You Risking Privacy for Convenience in Your Office?
Stop Printing Every Email: Culture Change for the Modern Office
Photocopier Per Click Charges Explained: What Every Business Needs to Know Before Signing